01
Define the review standard
Keep the step small enough that your team can review the result and decide what to improve next.
Digital tools / AI & knowledge
Digital tools & subscriptions
Turnitin Instructor AI
A selection guide for academic integrity and writing-review workflows that need a clear human decision process.
Selection decision
Decide how automated signals can support review without replacing professional judgement.
Good fit
Use the tool around a real workflow.
Education teams reviewing written work
Organisations setting transparent assessment processes
A practical setup path
02
Choose the evidence a reviewer needs
Keep the step small enough that your team can review the result and decide what to improve next.
03
Document the escalation path
Keep the step small enough that your team can review the result and decide what to improve next.
Before you choose
Questions worth answering first.
What can the signal actually prove?
Who reviews uncertain cases?
How will you explain the process fairly?
Related tools
Need a practical selection plan?